Ugandan Military Confirms Detention of Missing Catholic Priest Amid Rising Human Rights Concerns

The Ugandan military has confirmed that it is holding a Catholic priest who went missing nearly two weeks ago, accusing him of involvement in what it described as violent subversive activities. In a brief statement, the military said Father Deusdedit Ssekabira had been arrested, was in lawful custody, and would be formally charged in court.

The confirmation follows growing concern from the Catholic Church and civil society after Father Ssekabira’s disappearance earlier this month. The Catholic Diocese of Masaka had previously stated that the priest was kidnapped on 3 December by men wearing Uganda Army uniforms, a claim that sparked widespread anxiety within the religious community. The Church has not yet responded publicly to the military’s accusations.

Masaka Bishop Serverus Jjumba described the priest’s disappearance as a grievous wound inflicted on the diocese, the wider Catholic Church, and Father Ssekabira’s family. He said the incident had caused deep distress among parishioners and raised serious questions about the safety of clergy and civilians alike.

The case comes at a sensitive moment for Uganda, as the country prepares for national elections next month. In recent months, human rights organisations have intensified scrutiny of the government over reports of enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests, and prolonged detentions without trial, particularly involving opposition figures, activists, and perceived critics of the state.

While the military insists that Father Ssekabira’s detention is lawful and that due process will be followed, critics argue that the lack of transparency surrounding arrests fuels fear and mistrust. They warn that incidents involving religious leaders could further heighten tensions during an already politically charged period.

As calls grow for clarity and accountability, many Ugandans are watching closely to see whether Father Ssekabira will be promptly charged and granted access to legal representation, and whether the authorities will address broader concerns about civil liberties and the rule of law ahead of the elections.