Urban water pollution is a growing global threat, and Cape Town, South Africa, is confronting an alarming environmental and public health crisis. The city, home to more than five million residents and stretching along 300 kilometers of coastline, discharges over 40 million liters (40 megalitres) of raw sewage daily directly into the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, untreated runoff from informal settlements and underperforming wastewater treatment plants contaminates rivers and ultimately reaches both the Atlantic and Indian Oceans.
A multidisciplinary team of scientists has spent nearly a decade investigating Cape Town’s water systems including rivers, lakes, aquifers, and oceans, to identify the extent of pollution and associated risks. Their findings reveal a city grappling with severe environmental contamination, institutional conflicts of interest, outdated infrastructure, and poor public communication practices.
One of the most critical concerns is the presence of pharmaceutical and chemical compounds in the water that do not naturally degrade, instead accumulating in marine life and posing serious health risks through the food chain. These pollutants threaten not just aquatic ecosystems, but also the well-being of farmers, fishers, beachgoers, and consumers of locally sourced seafood and vegetables.
The researchers have flagged systemic problems with how water contamination data is collected, interpreted, and shared. Cape Town’s water quality reporting is often delayed by a week or more, undermining its usefulness due to the rapidly shifting nature of water currents. Furthermore, official reports often use 12-month rolling averages, which obscure contamination spikes and downplay risks to the public.
The team categorized communication failures into four types:
- Nondisclosure of data
- Misinformation through selective reporting
- Political misuse of city-funded research
- Static assessments that ignore dynamic water systems
They also raised red flags about city-funded research being conducted by consultancies hired by the very agencies responsible for environmental protection, leading to conflicts of interest and undermining scientific integrity. In some cases, city officials have dismissed independent findings, silencing critical voices and delaying solutions.
Notably, Cape Town has made small steps toward greater transparency. In 2023, it rescinded a controversial 2021 bylaw that banned independent testing of most water bodies, many of which lie within protected nature reserves. However, experts argue that far more needs to be done, starting with honest recognition that Cape Town’s wastewater treatment infrastructure is inadequate for a city of its size.
To restore trust, the scientists recommend that an independent body like the Academy of Science of South Africa be empowered to audit municipal scientific communications. They also advocate for real-time pollution prediction models based on weather and ocean data to protect public health and tourism industries.
The report is a call to action for Cape Town’s political leaders to move beyond brand protection and embrace evidence-based environmental stewardship. The researchers urge immediate investment in wastewater infrastructure upgrades and the institutionalization of transparent, independent scientific oversight.
This study is dedicated to the late Mpharu Hloyi, former head of Scientific Services at the City of Cape Town, who was known for his commitment to urban water health. His legacy now underscores a simple but urgent truth: Cape Town must overhaul both its approach to wastewater management and how it communicates environmental risk to the public. The health of its people, ecosystems, and future generations depends on it.
Leave a comment