Ghanaian investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas has had an $18 million defamation award dramatically reduced to just $500 by a US judge, following a legal battle with former Ghanaian Member of Parliament Kennedy Agyapong. The significant reduction comes months after a New Jersey jury had unanimously ruled in favor of Anas, finding that Agyapong had defamed him by calling him a “criminal” and accusing him of being involved in the murder of fellow journalist Ahmed Suale.
The defamatory remarks were made during a podcast interview on the Daddy Fred Show, which was recorded in the United States, where Agyapong owns property and was residing at the time. Anas pursued the lawsuit in the US after first losing a related case in Ghana, where the judge controversially described his investigative journalism as “investigative terrorism.”
The New Jersey jury, however, saw things differently and initially awarded Anas $18 million in damages in March. Agyapong’s legal team swiftly filed a motion to reduce the amount, arguing that the compensation was excessive and legally indefensible. The judge agreed, declaring the award “disproportionate and legally unsustainable.” Agyapong confirmed the revised judgment on social media, posting on X (formerly Twitter) that the final sum had been cut to just $500.
Despite the significant reduction in damages, Anas has vowed to appeal the judge’s decision. In a statement, he reiterated that the case was never about money but about justice and protecting the integrity of journalism. His media group, Tiger Eye P.I., emphasized that the lawsuit was intended to fight defamatory attacks and ensure accountability for public figures who use their platforms to spread misinformation.
Anas, who is internationally renowned for his undercover investigations into corruption across Africa, gained prominence after exposing widespread corruption in Ghanaian football through a high-profile documentary. The fallout from his exposés attracted both acclaim and criticism, including threats to his life and that of his colleagues.
One of his closest associates, Ahmed Suale, was tragically murdered in 2019 after his identity was revealed. Agyapong had previously broadcast Suale’s photo on television and urged viewers to “deal with him,” which critics say may have contributed to his death. Anas has publicly expressed ongoing grief over Suale’s loss and has vowed to continue his work in exposing corruption, despite the risks.
Known for concealing his identity with a signature beaded mask, Anas has received multiple international awards for journalism, including recognition from the BBC and press freedom organizations. His work continues to inspire journalists across Africa and globally, particularly those working in environments hostile to free expression and press freedom.
The case, though now financially diminished, has reignited debate about press freedom, defamation laws, and the power of investigative journalism in Africa. It also raises broader questions about the role of the judiciary in protecting journalists who expose powerful figures, and the limits of legal remedies in the face of systemic threats to press freedom.
As Anas pursues an appeal and remains steadfast in his commitment to truth and transparency, the outcome of this case will likely have lasting implications for journalists, whistleblowers, and defenders of press freedom worldwide.
Leave a comment